ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: A surge in critically ill patients with respiratory failure due to Covid-19 has overwhelmed ICU capacity in many healthcare systems across the world. Given a guarded prognosis and significant resource limitations, less invasive, inventive approaches such as prone positioning (PP) of non-intubated patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure were considered. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This is a prospective observational study and the aim is to evaluate the impact of awake PP at the ward level on the oxygenation levels of patients with COVID-19. We also are investigating as secondary outcomes, the risk factors for treatment failure among awake non-intubated patients who tolerated PP compared to those who did not. The primary outcome of this trial is the change in SpO2:FiO2 (SF) ratio from admission to discharge in the participants who tolerated PP compared to those that did not. Secondary outcomes included amongst others are ICU admission rate, in-hospital mortality, and length of stay. METHODS: A total of 63 patients admitted to Beaumont Hospital (BH), Dublin between January and February of 2021 with Covid-19 requiring supplemental oxygen were recruited. RESULTS: A total of 47 (74%) participants were reported as tolerating and 16 (26%) as non-tolerating PP. The mean rank in the primary endpoint in the tolerating group was 38 vs. 16 in the non-tolerating. This was statistically significant (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: PP was associated with improvements in oxygenation parameters without any reported serious adverse events. A well-designed, randomised control trial, testing the efficacy of PP in non-intubated Covid-19 patients is needed, before the widespread adoption of this practice.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The effect of prone positioning (PP) on respiratory mechanics remains uncertain in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO). METHODS: We prospectively analyzed the effects of PP on respiratory mechanics from continuous data with over a thousand time points during 16-h PP sessions in patients with COVID-19 and ARDS under VV-ECMO conditions. The evolution of respiratory mechanical and oxygenation parameters during the PP sessions was evaluated by dividing each PP session into four time quartiles: first quartile: 0-4 h, second quartile: 4-8 h, third quartile: 8-12 h, and fourth quartile: 12-16 h. RESULTS: Overall, 38 PP sessions were performed in 10 patients, with 3 [2-5] PP sessions per patient. Seven (70%) patients were responders to at least one PP session. PP significantly increased the PaO2/FiO2 ratio by 14 ± 21% and compliance by 8 ± 15%, and significantly decreased the oxygenation index by 13 ± 18% and driving pressure by 8 ± 12%. The effects of PP on respiratory mechanics but not on oxygenation persisted after supine repositioning. PP-induced changes in different respiratory mechanical parameters and oxygenation started as early as the first-time quartile, without any difference in PP-induced changes among the different time quartiles. PP-induced changes in driving pressure (-14 ± 14 vs. -6 ± 10%, p = 0.04) and mechanical power (-11 ± 13 vs. -0.1 ± 12%, p = 0.02) were significantly higher in responders (increase in PaO2/FiO2 ratio > 20%) than in non-responder patients. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with COVID-19 and severe ARDS, PP under VV-ECMO conditions improved the respiratory mechanical and oxygenation parameters, and the effects of PP on respiratory mechanics persisted after supine repositioning.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Respiration, Artificial , SARS-CoV-2Subject(s)
COVID-19/therapy , Dexmedetomidine/administration & dosage , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/methods , Oxygen/administration & dosage , Prone Position , Wakefulness , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Patient Positioning/methods , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
We present a single centre study describing the effect of awake prone position (PP) on oxygenation and clinical outcomes in spontaneously breathing patients with novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Between 1st March and 30th April 2020, forty eight of 138 patients managed outside of the critical care unit with facemask oxygen, high flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), underwent PP. Prone position was associated with significant improvement in oxygenation, lower ICU admission, tracheal intubation, and shorter ICU length of stay. Lack of response to PP may be an indicator of treatment failure, requiring early escalation.